Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 38% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3550 - 360 vs 260 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $96.0 vs $335.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3550 - $0.27 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12304 minutes ago
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |