Buy on Amazon
$126.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 43 days newer than the more expensive Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 62% better in League of Legends than Athlon 200GE - 162 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $126.93 vs $149.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i5-9400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores 2. 90 GHz up to 4. 10 GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W Processors BX80684I59400
Buy for $126.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
64.23410404624278%
Multi-Core
1857
38.72784150156413%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
