Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400 - 142 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $115.99 vs $160.91
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9400 - $0.82 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2179 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |