Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600T is 944 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-8600T - $39.9 vs $122.54
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600T doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $122.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75005 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75006 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.14773629864972%
Multi-Core
992
21.278421278421277%
Intel Core i5-8600T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |