Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 345 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 244 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $125.0 vs $1595.95
- Up to 92% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.51 vs $6.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 95 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 44 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55721 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
239
97.95081967213115%
Value, $/FPS
$6.68/FPS
7.634730538922156%
Price, $
$1595.95
7%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 22 |
6 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |