Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1552 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $148.49 vs $432.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900F - $0.26 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8600K - 706 vs 576 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 24 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
576
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $148.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6528 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
706
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
42%
Price, $
$432.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |