Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8500T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8500T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8500T
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1620 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-8500T - $49.0 vs $125.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-8500T - $0.45 vs $1.05 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
42.857142857142854%
Price, $
$125
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3901 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
92.43697478991596%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.63166807790009%
Multi-Core
723
17.56133106631042%
Intel Core i5-8500T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |