Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1639 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $139.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - $0.77 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8400T - 222 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 32 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3431 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
36%
Price, $
$469.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |