Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $139.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.29 vs $2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - 118 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 24 vs 6 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
108
91.52542372881356%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6792 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
63.56275303643725%
Multi-Core
3884
38.723828514456635%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |