Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 56 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 412 vs 404 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $74.64 vs $250.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74235 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
404
98.05825242718447%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
29%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
86.77014042867701%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |