Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8300H outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8300H is 454 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8300H
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930T - 179 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8300H - 35 vs 45 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-8300H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8300H | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-8300H or Celeron G3930T
World of Warcraft, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
83 FPS
$9.63/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Core i5-8300H
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$799
In Stock
83 FPS
$9.01/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Core i5-8300H
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$748
In Stock
83 FPS
$10.83/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Core i5-8300H
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
