Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $72.71 vs $521.66
- Up to 84% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-14900F - $0.34 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-7500 - 251 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
215
85.65737051792829%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$72.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $72.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62394 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
16.346153846153847%
Price, $
$521.66
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1270
42.05298013245033%
Multi-Core
3478
19.036672140120416%
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |