Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7500 is 177 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than EPYC 7551P - 56 vs 50 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 64 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |