Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $52.0 vs $469.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i9-13900KF - $0.38 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 57% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i5-7400T - 217 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1180 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
17%
Price, $
$469.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |