Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $75.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-7920X - $0.48 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400T - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |