Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $179.95 vs $528.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $1.06 vs $2.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-6600T - 216 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 32 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
169
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
43%
Price, $
$528.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |