Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $179.95 vs $899.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13400F - $0.91 vs $4.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than Core i5-6600T - 217 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
198
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
21%
Price, $
$899.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |