Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1764 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Core i5-6600T - 180 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $139.99 vs $179.95
- Up to 24% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-6600T - $0.78 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
175
97.22222222222221%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
75.72815533980582%
Price, $
$179.95
77%
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1662 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
76.73814165042235%
Multi-Core
3223
69.6714223951578%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |