Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2794 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $149.95 vs $397.83
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7940X - $1.3 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 73 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-660 - 130 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 28 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14331 minutes ago
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |