Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4646 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $149.95 vs $469.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900KF - $1.39 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 52% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-660 - 164 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
108
65%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
48%
Price, $
$469.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |