Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 578 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1820 - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $39.59 vs $61.8
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-6400 - $0.27 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
65.85365853658537%
Price, $
$61.8
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $61.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
145
97.31543624161074%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
44.19441944194419%
Multi-Core
825
27.290770757525635%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |