Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $79.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.11 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Core i5-6400 - 705 vs 702 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
28%
Price, $
$270
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |