Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-580M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2531 days newer than Core i5-580M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-580M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-580M - 529 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-580M - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-580M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-580M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
