Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 585 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 529 vs 492 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |