Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 2605 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom X4 9650 - 106 vs 86 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $39.99 vs $90.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-5675C - $0.47 vs $0.85 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
55.294117647058826%
Price, $
$90
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2295 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
86
81.13207547169812%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
17.761194029850746%
Multi-Core
765
18.754596714881096%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Broadwell | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |