Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 4471 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-540M - 478 vs 366 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-540M - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-540M doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-540M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
