Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $56.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100 - $0.44 vs $1.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
99.21875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3819 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
41.904761904761905%
Price, $
$135
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
95.66265060240964%
Multi-Core
3303
97.00440528634361%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |