Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-4670T - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 6 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |