Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $55.26 vs $96.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-9400F - $1.02 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i5-4670S - 58 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 6 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
54
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11324 minutes ago
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |