Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $70.0 vs $721.95
- Up to 90% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.35 vs $13.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Core i5-4570T - 55 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7208 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.13/FPS
10%
Price, $
$721.95
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $721.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |