Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570S
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $59.57 vs $85.13
- Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10105F - $0.25 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-4570S - 243 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570S - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
237
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6591 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
71%
Price, $
$85.13
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6590 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570S | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |