Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3504 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $69.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900F - $0.15 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 51% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3570 - 706 vs 468 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
706
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
24%
Price, $
$432.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |