Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1896 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Core i5-3470S - 185 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 24 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
51.4480408858603%
Multi-Core
1724
24.71330275229358%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |