Buy on Amazon
$86
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2364 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - $86.0 vs $99.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-9500 - $0.41 vs $0.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-3450S - 217 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 6 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
211
97.23502304147466%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Core i5-9500
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
89.13043478260869%
Price, $
$99.99
86%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-9500 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I59500)
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i5-9500
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
39.782016348773844%
Multi-Core
1681
33.687374749499%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
