Buy on Amazon
$59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3450 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3450 is 609 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-560 - 461 vs 443 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-560 - $59.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-560 - $0.13 vs $0.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 73 vs 77 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
461
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19451 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-560 Processor 3.33 GHz 4 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
