Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3210 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3427U - 176 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |