Buy on Amazon
$143.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Core i5-3427U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3427U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3427U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3427U - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3427U - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3427U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3427U | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-3427U or Core i5-10600K
Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing
9 FPS
$99.89/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i5-10600K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
