Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2117 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3380M - 181 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3380M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |