Buy on Amazon
$149.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $425
Availability
MSRP in USD: $425
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 2101 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330S
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $149.95 vs $260.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-8086K - $1.92 vs $2.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 14% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i5-3330S - 89 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 12 vs 4 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3330S
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
78
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3330S Processor 2.7GHz 5.0GT-s 6MB LGA 1155 CPU44; OEM
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12336 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-8086K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 5.0 GHz unlocked LGA 1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3330S
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i7-8086K
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330S | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 40th |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
