Buy on Amazon
$149.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1858 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3330S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 40% better in F1 23 than Core i5-3330S - 216 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-3330S - $130.72 vs $149.95
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-3330S - $0.61 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 6 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i5-3330S Processor 2.7GHz 5.0GT-s 6MB LGA 1155 CPU44; OEM
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $130.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3330S
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330S | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
