Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3330S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2796 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3330S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3330S - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-3330S - $99.95 vs $149.95
- Up to 39% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-3330S - $0.82 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330S - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12474 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |