Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Core i5-3320M - 58 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 6 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |