Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2314 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than Core i5-3320M - 757 vs 689 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 48 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
757
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |