Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 17 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Core i5-3317U - 647 vs 595 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3317U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
