Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2405 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $70.0 vs $721.95
- Up to 89% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.62 vs $5.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 18% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i5-2400S - 133 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1052 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.43/FPS
11%
Price, $
$721.95
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $721.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |