Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3952 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $80.68 vs $276.95
- Up to 66% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-12900K - $0.12 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2400 - 786 vs 677 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
677
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
786
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
34%
Price, $
$276.95
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $276.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |