Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4013 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $34.95 vs $249.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-12700F - $0.31 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2400 - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
112
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12315 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
16%
Price, $
$249.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |