Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 209 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $39.9 vs $293.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14600KF - $0.26 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
18%
Price, $
$293.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $293.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |