Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3570K - 132 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $139.0 vs $199.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - $1.23 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
80%
Price, $
$199.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2184 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |