Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1688 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 259 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $130.0 vs $268.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13600K - $0.55 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
52%
Price, $
$268.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7817 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
236
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |